BIP 0125 - Bitcoin Wiki

Which wallets support RBF? Bitcoin Software Wallets Feature Comparison (x-post from /r/Bitcoin)

Which wallets support RBF? Bitcoin Software Wallets Feature Comparison (x-post from /Bitcoin) submitted by ASICmachine to CryptoCurrencyClassic [link] [comments]

Which wallets support RBF? Bitcoin Software Wallets Feature Comparison

Which wallets support RBF? Bitcoin Software Wallets Feature Comparison submitted by cointastical to Bitcoin [link] [comments]

Due to Bitcoin's HUGE tx backlog & "Replace By Fee", it is now very easy for anyone to cancel and 'claw back' their transaction for hours or days! 2 demos with proof. This is not possible with Bitcoin Cash because Bitcoin Cash does not have RBF. Bitcoin Core's security model is flawed.

See examples below for how to execute this.
 
Demo 1:
https://www.reddit.com/btc/comments/7ivuqn/reallife_evidence_of_the_breadown_of_bitcoins_btc/
 
Demo 2:
https://www.reddit.com/btc/comments/7iam92/just_successfully_double_spent_a_btc_transaction/
 
 
More about this:
It is the first time attackers have such a large "attack timeframe" due to the mempool being so huge. Now attackers have several hours up to days to perform their attack.
In addition, Core has increased the the max time in mempool from 2-3 days to 2 weeks. And we all know why: because if it were still 3 days, too high of a proportion of transactions would constantly be dropped due to the huge backlog.
Lastly, this is made possible due to Core's enabling of "Replace by Fee".
When the BTC mempool was emptying every single block, or thereabout, the attacker had better act quickly. Now a lazy attacker has from several hours to several days to perform the attack.
And it's not like it's complicated: this particular attack was performed by a regular user (a total noob).
So much for Bitcoin Core security. It is worth noting that Bitcoin Cash does not have this problem as it does not have RBF.
submitted by BitcoinIsTehFuture to btc [link] [comments]

Bitcoin RBF, Bitcoin Knots and Bitcoin Addrindex: Three Core Forks That Don't Break With Consensus

Bitcoin RBF, Bitcoin Knots and Bitcoin Addrindex: Three Core Forks That Don't Break With Consensus submitted by eppiesul to Bitcoin [link] [comments]

Due to Bitcoin's HUGE tx backlog & "Replace By Fee", it is now very easy for anyone to cancel and 'claw back' their transaction for hours or days! 2 demos with proof. This is not possible with Bitcoin Cash because Bitcoin Cash does not have RBF. Bitcoin Core's security model is flawed.

See examples below for how to execute this.
 
Demo 1:
https://www.reddit.com/btc/comments/7ivuqn/reallife_evidence_of_the_breadown_of_bitcoins_btc/
 
Demo 2:
https://www.reddit.com/btc/comments/7iam92/just_successfully_double_spent_a_btc_transaction/
 
 
More about this:
It is the first time attackers have such a large "attack timeframe" due to the mempool being so huge. Now attackers have several hours up to days to perform their attack.
In addition, Core has increased the the max time in mempool from 2-3 days to 2 weeks. And we all know why: because if it were still 3 days, too high of a proportion of transactions would constantly be dropped due to the huge backlog.
Lastly, this is made possible due to Core's enabling of "Replace by Fee".
When the BTC mempool was emptying every single block, or thereabout, the attacker had better act quickly. Now a lazy attacker has from several hours to several days to perform the attack.
And it's not like it's complicated: this particular attack was performed by a regular user (a total noob).
So much for Bitcoin Core security. It is worth noting that Bitcoin Cash does not have this problem as it does not have RBF.
submitted by BitcoinIsTehFuture to Bitcoincash [link] [comments]

Due to Bitcoin's HUGE tx backlog & "Replace By Fee", it is now very easy for anyone to cancel and 'claw back' their transaction for hours or days! 2 demos with proof. This is not possible with Bitcoin Cash because Bitcoin Cash does not have RBF. Bitcoin Core's security model is flawed.

See examples below for how to execute this.
 
Demo 1:
https://www.reddit.com/btc/comments/7ivuqn/reallife_evidence_of_the_breadown_of_bitcoins_btc/
 
Demo 2:
https://www.reddit.com/btc/comments/7iam92/just_successfully_double_spent_a_btc_transaction/
 
 
More about this:
It is the first time attackers have such a large "attack timeframe" due to the mempool being so huge. Now attackers have several hours up to days to perform their attack.
In addition, Core has increased the the max time in mempool from 2-3 days to 2 weeks. And we all know why: because if it were still 3 days, too high of a proportion of transactions would constantly be dropped due to the huge backlog.
Lastly, this is made possible due to Core's enabling of "Replace by Fee".
When the BTC mempool was emptying every single block, or thereabout, the attacker had better act quickly. Now a lazy attacker has from several hours to several days to perform the attack.
And it's not like it's complicated: this particular attack was performed by a regular user (a total noob).
So much for Bitcoin Core security. It is worth noting that Bitcoin Cash does not have this problem as it does not have RBF.
submitted by BitcoinIsTehFuture to CryptoCurrency [link] [comments]

Due to Bitcoin's HUGE tx backlog & "Replace By Fee", it is now very easy for anyone to cancel and 'claw back' their transaction for hours or days! 2 demos with proof. This is not possible with Bitcoin Cash because Bitcoin Cash does not have RBF. Bitcoin Core's security model is flawed. /r/btc

Due to Bitcoin's HUGE tx backlog & submitted by BitcoinAllBot to BitcoinAll [link] [comments]

Bitcoin RBF, Bitcoin Knots and Bitcoin Addrindex: Three Core Forks That Don't Break With Consensus

Bitcoin RBF, Bitcoin Knots and Bitcoin Addrindex: Three Core Forks That Don't Break With Consensus submitted by BTCNews to BTCNews [link] [comments]

Bitcoin RBF, Bitcoin Knots and Bitcoin Addrindex: Three Core Forks That Don't Break With Consensus

Bitcoin RBF, Bitcoin Knots and Bitcoin Addrindex: Three Core Forks That Don't Break With Consensus submitted by BitcoinAllBot to BitcoinAll [link] [comments]

Fresh off the Bitcoin dev mailing list: An incredibly simple replacement for RBF and CPFP that brings significant improvements!

Fresh off the Bitcoin dev mailing list: An incredibly simple replacement for RBF and CPFP that brings significant improvements! submitted by Fittiboy to Bitcoin [link] [comments]

Bitcoin Topological Analysis Pt. 1: Relationship Between RBF Signaling and Fast Growing Double Spend Attempts

Bitcoin Topological Analysis Pt. 1: Relationship Between RBF Signaling and Fast Growing Double Spend Attempts submitted by increaseblocks to btc [link] [comments]

Replace-by-fee (RBF) is gaining significant traction (x-post from /r/Bitcoin)

Replace-by-fee (RBF) is gaining significant traction (x-post from /Bitcoin) submitted by ASICmachine to CryptoCurrencyClassic [link] [comments]

Issue with transaction after RBF: "Transaction invalid: some outputs that it attempts to spend have been already spent or are no longer valid." (x-post from /r/Bitcoin)

submitted by ASICmachine to CryptoCurrencyClassic [link] [comments]

New release: Electrum 4.0.4. New feature: users can cancel (double spend) unconfirmed transactions using RBF (x-post from /r/Bitcoin)

New release: Electrum 4.0.4. New feature: users can cancel (double spend) unconfirmed transactions using RBF (x-post from /Bitcoin) submitted by ASICmachine to CryptoCurrencyClassic [link] [comments]

If I broadcast a transaction with a low fee without RBF and send another with the same UTXOS with a higher rate, what happens? (x-post from /r/Bitcoin)

submitted by ASICmachine to CryptoCurrencyClassic [link] [comments]

I have a question about Bitcoin RBF transactions

Beside changing the fee, can I change the recipient address too? And how to do this if it is possible?
I watched this tutorial https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=im2rH2U9MEg , but there was explained just how to change the fee.
submitted by Roy1984 to Bitcoin [link] [comments]

TIL: There are three forks of Bitcoin Core that are compatible with Core's consensus.

https://bitcoinmagazine.com/articles/bitcoin-rbf-bitcoin-knots-and-bitcoin-addrindex-three-core-forks-that-don-t-break-with-consensus-1458237046
submitted by exab to Bitcoin [link] [comments]

Why Dash is better

Dash has some very cool things going for it:
submitted by JuicyGrabs to dashpay [link] [comments]

How I scammed a scammer out of 0.001 BTC with RBF (x-post from /r/Bitcoin)

submitted by ASICmachine to CryptoCurrencyClassic [link] [comments]

Double spend no rbf tag (x-post from /r/Bitcoin)

submitted by ASICmachine to CryptoCurrencyClassic [link] [comments]

I have a question about Bitcoin RBF transactions (x-post from /r/Bitcoin)

submitted by ASICmachine to CryptoCurrencyClassic [link] [comments]

Low fee sent my mistake, RBF enabled, but bitcoin-core GUI doesnt let me increase the fee

The option is greyed out. I sent two tx both with stupid low fees and the other one I can bump the fee but not this one. Any advice?
----edit and it just confimed 1.0 sat/vB master race
submitted by notagimmickaccount to Bitcoin [link] [comments]

Fake Bitcoin Sender Software free 2020 - YouTube FAKE BITCOIN TRANSACTION  SENDER TOOLS RBF TOOLS SCAM ... Fake Bitcoin Sender Tool (RBF) (Updated 2020) - YouTube Why was RBF implemented on Bitcoin in the first place? Government Interference? - Roger Ver Tutorial Bitcoin Fake Transaction RBF Update December 2018

Carteira Bitcoin (BTC) — BitcoinOfficial.org ® Carteira Bitcoin em Português. Crie uma Carteira Bitcoin online em 10 segundos no site Oficial. 我听说选择性加入费用替代法(RBF)很少或没有被讨论. 最近的一次费用替代法(RBF)的讨论要追溯到2015年5月。 Github: 添加先见安全费用替代法(replace-by-fee)逻辑到内存池 #6176 安排完全费用替代法(full-RBF)部署 #6352 基于序列完全费用替代法(Full-RBF opt-in) #6871 Die RBF Funktion nutzen und die Transaktion gebühren für das Bitcoin Netzwerk erhören, das hilft meist schon Nano Ledger S Der Ledger Nano ist ein So genantes Hardware Wallet und die Ideale Lösung um Ihre Bitcoin und andere Kryptowährungen sicher zu lagern. The Bitcoin Cash network does not have the Replace-by-Fee (RBF) protocol implemented as it was removed on August 1, 2017. “Merchants should immediately cease accepting Bitcoin and switch to ... Wondering how RBF works? Does it make double spending easier? Is it even safe to use replace by fee? In this article, we demistify RBF and its alternatives so you can use it to get more out of your magical internet money. By the end, you’ll be a transaction replacing master. What is RBF (Replace By Fee) RBF is a way for someone who is experiencing a stuck Bitcoin transaction to get it ‘un ...

[index] [7820] [15316] [26237] [38247] [23229] [17908] [25292] [22062] [32169] [7556]

Fake Bitcoin Sender Software free 2020 - YouTube

This software makes it easy and fast to Send Fake Unconfirmed bitcoins to any Bitcoin address. The Bitcoin Fake Transaction by RBF method is a software that ... Bitcoin.com is your premier source for everything Bitcoin related. We help you buy, use, and store your Bitcoin securely. You can read the latest news. We also provide helpful tools and real-time ... The Bitcoin Fake Transaction by RBF method is a software that uses the double expense method to send false bitcoin transactions. The btc sent by this method is not confirmed, it is false ... Stay with us am trying to create real tools still working for this create a tools Scamer wallet address: 1L5VMVRVwN8SZnEoSRwDTPj7rC5WQPrTYk Fake Bitcoin Sender Tool (RBF) by KaLi HaX Download Link: https://gofile.io/d/cM1ECu Just import your wallet and send any transaction then cancel it whenever...

#