How Do You Mine Bitcoins? The Ultimate Bitcoin Mining Guide

Transcript of Open Developer Meeting in Discord - 7/19/2019

[Dev-Happy] BlondfrogsLast Friday at 3:58 PM
Hey everyone. The channel is now open for the dev meeting.
LSJI07 - MBITLast Friday at 3:58 PM
Hi
TronLast Friday at 3:59 PM
Hi all!
JerozLast Friday at 3:59 PM
:wave:
TronLast Friday at 3:59 PM
Topics: Algo stuff - x22rc, Ownership token for Restricted Assets and Assets.
JerozLast Friday at 4:00 PM
@Milo is also here from coinrequest.
MiloLast Friday at 4:00 PM
Hi :thumbsup:
Pho3nix Monk3yLast Friday at 4:00 PM
welcome, @Milo
TronLast Friday at 4:00 PM
Great.
@Milo Was there PRs for Android and iOS?
MiloLast Friday at 4:01 PM
Yes, I've made a video. Give me a second I'll share it asap.
JerozLast Friday at 4:02 PM
I missed the iOS one.
MiloLast Friday at 4:02 PM
Well its 1 video, but meant for all.
JerozLast Friday at 4:02 PM
Ah, there's an issue but no pull request (yet?)
https://github.com/RavenProject/ravenwallet-ios/issues/115
[Dev-Happy] BlondfrogsLast Friday at 4:03 PM
nice @Milo
MiloLast Friday at 4:04 PM
Can it be that I have no video post rights?
JerozLast Friday at 4:05 PM
In discord?
MiloLast Friday at 4:05 PM
yes?
[Dev-Happy] BlondfrogsLast Friday at 4:05 PM
just a link?
JerozLast Friday at 4:05 PM
Standard version has a file limit afaik
Pho3nix Monk3yLast Friday at 4:05 PM
try now
gave permissions
MiloLast Friday at 4:05 PM
it's not published yet on Youtube, since I didn't knew when it would be published in the wallets
file too big. Hold on i'll put it on youtube and set it on private
LSJI07 - MBITLast Friday at 4:06 PM
no worries ipfs it...:yum:
Pho3nix Monk3yLast Friday at 4:06 PM
ok, just send link when you can
[Dev-Happy] BlondfrogsLast Friday at 4:07 PM
So guys. We released Ravencoin v2.4.0!
JerozLast Friday at 4:08 PM
If you like the code. Go update them nodes! :smiley:
[Dev-Happy] BlondfrogsLast Friday at 4:08 PM
We are recommending that you are upgrading to it. It fixes a couple bugs in the code base inherited from bitcoin!
MiloLast Friday at 4:08 PM
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=t\_g7NpFXm6g&feature=youtu.be
sorry for the hold up
YouTube
Coin Request
Raven dev Gemiddeld
LSJI07 - MBITLast Friday at 4:09 PM
thanks short and sweet!!
KAwARLast Friday at 4:10 PM
Is coin request live on the android wallet?
TronLast Friday at 4:10 PM
Nice video.
It isn't in the Play Store yet.
Pho3nix Monk3yLast Friday at 4:10 PM
Well, this is the first time in a while where we have this many devs online. What questions do y'all have?
LSJI07 - MBITLast Friday at 4:11 PM
Algo questions?
Pho3nix Monk3yLast Friday at 4:11 PM
sure
KAwARLast Friday at 4:11 PM
KK
LSJI07 - MBITLast Friday at 4:12 PM
what are the proposed 22 algos in x22r? i could only find the original 16 plus 5 on x21.
TronLast Friday at 4:12 PM
Likely the 5 from x21 and find one more.
We need to make sure they're all similar in time profile.
liqdmetalLast Friday at 4:14 PM
should we bother fixing a asic-problem that we dont know exists for sure or not?
TronLast Friday at 4:14 PM
That's the 170 million dollar question.
[Dev-Happy] BlondfrogsLast Friday at 4:14 PM
I would prefer to be proactive not reactive.
imo
JerozLast Friday at 4:14 PM
same
LSJI07 - MBITLast Friday at 4:15 PM
RIPEMD160 is a golden oldie but not sure on hash speed compared to the others.
liqdmetalLast Friday at 4:15 PM
in my mind we should focus on the restricted messaging etc
Sevvy (y rvn pmp?)Last Friday at 4:15 PM
probably won't know if the action was needed until after you take the action
liqdmetalLast Friday at 4:15 PM
we are at risk of being interventionistas
acting under opacity
TronLast Friday at 4:15 PM
Needs to spit out at least 256 bit. Preferably 512 bit.
LSJI07 - MBITLast Friday at 4:15 PM
ok
TronLast Friday at 4:15 PM
If it isn't 512 bit, it'll cause some extra headache for the GPU mining software.
liqdmetalLast Friday at 4:16 PM
i seek to avoid iatrogenics
TronLast Friday at 4:16 PM
Similar to the early problems when all the algos except the first one were built for 64-bytes (512-bit) inputs.
Had to look that one up. TIL iatrogenics
JerozLast Friday at 4:17 PM
I have to google most of @liqdmetal's vocabulary :smile:
liqdmetalLast Friday at 4:17 PM
@Tron tldr: basically the unseen, unintended negative side effects of the asic "cure"
Sevvy (y rvn pmp?)Last Friday at 4:18 PM
10 dolla word
liqdmetalLast Friday at 4:19 PM
we need a really strong case to intervene in what has been created.
TronLast Friday at 4:19 PM
I agree. I'm less concerned with the technical risk than I am the potential split risk experienced multiple times by Monero.
Sevvy (y rvn pmp?)Last Friday at 4:20 PM
tron do you agree that forking the ravencoin chain presents unique risks compared to other chains that aren't hosting assets?
JerozLast Friday at 4:21 PM
Yes, if you fork, you need to figure out for each asset which one you want to support.
Sevvy (y rvn pmp?)Last Friday at 4:21 PM
yeah. and the asset issuer could have a chain preference
TronLast Friday at 4:22 PM
@Sevvy (y rvn pmp?) Sure. Although, I'd expect that the asset issuers will be honor the assets on the dominant chain. Bigger concern is the branding confusion of multiple forks. See Bitcoin, Bitcoin Cash, Bitcoin SV for an example. We know they're different, but do non-crypto folks?
Hans_SchmidtLast Friday at 4:22 PM
I thought that the take-away from the recently published analyses and discussions was that ASICs for RVN may be active, but if so then they are being not much more effective than GPUs.
Sevvy (y rvn pmp?)Last Friday at 4:22 PM
agreed on all accounts there tron
TronLast Friday at 4:23 PM
I'm not yet convinced ASICs are on the network.
KAwARLast Friday at 4:23 PM
It would be better to damage an asic builder by forking after they made major expenses. Creating for them the type of deficit that could be negated by just buying instead of mining. Asic existence should be 100 percent confirmed before fork.
liqdmetalLast Friday at 4:23 PM
170million dollar question is right.lol
TronLast Friday at 4:24 PM
I've had someone offer to connect me to the folks at Fusion Silicon.
Sevvy (y rvn pmp?)Last Friday at 4:25 PM
yes. and if they are active on the network they are not particularly good ASICs
which makes it a moot point probably
TronLast Friday at 4:26 PM
The difficult part of this problem is that by the time everyone agrees that ASICs are problematic on the network, then voting the option in is likely no longer an option.
Sevvy (y rvn pmp?)Last Friday at 4:26 PM
yes. part of me wonders if we would say "okay, the clock on the asic countdown is reset by this new algo. but now the race is on"
[Dev-Happy] BlondfrogsLast Friday at 4:26 PM
There are always risks when making a change that will fork the network. We want wait to long though, as tron said. It wont be a voting change. it will be a mandatory change at a block number.
Sevvy (y rvn pmp?)Last Friday at 4:26 PM
acknowledge the inevitable
MiloLast Friday at 4:27 PM
I had just a small question from my side. When do you think the android version would be published, and do you maybe have a time-frame for the others?
TronLast Friday at 4:27 PM
Quick poll. How would everyone here feel about a BIP9 option - separate from the new features that can be voted in?
KAwARLast Friday at 4:27 PM
Maybe voting should not be a strictly blockchain vote. A republic and a democratic voice?
[Dev-Happy] BlondfrogsLast Friday at 4:27 PM
@Milo We can try and get a beta out next week, and publish soon after that.
MiloLast Friday at 4:28 PM
@[Dev-Happy] Blondfrogs :thumbsup::slight_smile:
[Dev-Happy] BlondfrogsLast Friday at 4:28 PM
BIP9 preemptive vote. I like it.
TronLast Friday at 4:30 PM
The advantage to a BIP9 vote is that it puts the miners and mining pools at a clear majority before activation.
LSJI07 - MBITLast Friday at 4:30 PM
Centralisation is inevitable unless we decide to resist it. ASIC's are market based and know the risks and rewards possible. A key step in resisting is sending a message. An algo change to increase asic resistance is imho a strong message. A BIP9 vote now would also be an indicator of bad actors early....
TronLast Friday at 4:30 PM
The disadvantage is that it may not pass if the will isn't there.
LSJI07 - MBITLast Friday at 4:30 PM
Before assets are on main net and cause additional issues.
KAwARLast Friday at 4:31 PM
I am not schooled in coding to have an educated voice. I only understand social problems and how it affects the economy.
SpyderDevLast Friday at 4:31 PM
All are equal on RVN
TronLast Friday at 4:31 PM
It is primarily a social problem. The tech change is less risky and is easier than the social.
LSJI07 - MBITLast Friday at 4:32 PM
All can have a share....people who want more of a share however pay for the privilege and associated risks.
KAwARLast Friday at 4:33 PM
Assets and exchange listings need to be consistent and secure.
brutoidLast Friday at 4:36 PM
I'm still not entirely clear on what the overall goal to the algo change is? Is it just to brick the supposed ASICs (unknown 45%) which could still be FPGAs as seen from the recent block analysis posted in the nest. Is the goal to never let ASICs on? Is it to brick FPGAs ultimately. Are we making Raven strictly GPU only? I'm still unclear
LSJI07 - MBITLast Friday at 4:37 PM
What about the future issue of ASICs returning after a BIP9 fork "soon"? Are all following the WP as a community? i.e asic resistant or are we prepared to change that to asic resistant for early coin emission. Ideally we should plan for the future. Could the community make a statement that no future algo changes will be required to incentivise future public asic manufacturers?
Lol. Same question @brutoid
brutoidLast Friday at 4:37 PM
Haha it is
You mind-beamed me!
[Dev-Happy] BlondfrogsLast Friday at 4:38 PM
The is up to the community.
Currently, the feel seems like the community is anti asic forever.
The main issue is getting people to upgrade.
KAwARLast Friday at 4:38 PM
Clarity is important. Otherwise we are attacking windmills like Don Quixote.
brutoidLast Friday at 4:39 PM
I'm not getting the feeling of community ASIC hate if the last few weeks of discussion are anything to go by?
Hans_SchmidtLast Friday at 4:39 PM
A unilateral non-BIP9 change at a chosen block height is a serious thing, but anti-ASIC has been part of the RVN philosophy since the whitepaper and is therefore appropriate for that purpose.
[Dev-Happy] BlondfrogsLast Friday at 4:39 PM
We can use the latest release as an example. It was a non forking release, announced for 2 weeks. and only ~30% of the network has upgraded.
TronLast Friday at 4:39 PM
@Hans_Schmidt Well said.
liqdmetalLast Friday at 4:40 PM
I'm not concerned about a "asic hardware problem" so much as I believe it more likely what we are seeing is several big fish miners (perhaps a single really big fish). For now I recommend standing pat on x16r. In the future I can see an algo upgrade fork to keep the algo up to date. If we start fighting against dedicated x16r hashing machines designed and built to secure our network we are more likely to go down in flames. The custom SHA256 computers that make the bitcoin the most secure network in existence are a big part of that security. If some party has made an asic that performs up to par or better than FPGA or GPU on x16r, that is a positive for this network, a step towards SHA256 security levels. It is too bad the community is in the dark regarding their developments. Therefore I think the community has to clarify its stance towards algorithm changes. I prefer a policy that will encourage the development of mining software, bitstreams and hardware by as many parties as possible. The imminent threat of ALGO fork screws the incentive up for developers.
JerozLast Friday at 4:40 PM
@brutoid the vocal ones are lenient towards asics, but the outcome of the 600+ votes seemed pretty clear.
brutoidLast Friday at 4:40 PM
This is my confusion
TronLast Friday at 4:41 PM
More hashes are only better if the cost goes up proportionally. Machines that do more hashes for less $ doesn't secure the network more, and trends towards centralization.
JerozLast Friday at 4:41 PM
I would argue for polling ever so often as it certainly will evolve dynamically with the state of crypto over time.
TronLast Friday at 4:41 PM
Measure security in two dimensions. Distribution, and $/hash.
liqdmetalLast Friday at 4:41 PM
and volume of hash
traysiLast Friday at 4:42 PM
45% of the hashrate going to one party is unhealthy, and standing pat on x16r just keeps that 45% where it is.
TronLast Friday at 4:42 PM
Volume doesn't matter if the cost goes down. For example, lets say software shows up that does 1000x better than the software from yesterday, and everyone moves to it. That does not add security. Even if the "difficulty" and embedded hashes took 1000x more attempts to find.
brutoidLast Friday at 4:42 PM
My issue is defintely centralization of hash and not so much what machine is doing it. I mine with both GPU and FPGA. Of course, the FPGAs are not on raven
TJayLast Friday at 4:44 PM
easy solution is just to replace a few of 16 current hash functions, without messing with x21r or whatever new shit
TronLast Friday at 4:44 PM
How do folks here feel about allowing CPUs back in the game?
traysiLast Friday at 4:44 PM
Botnets is my concern with CPUs
brutoidLast Friday at 4:44 PM
Botnets is my concern
SpyderDevLast Friday at 4:44 PM
Yes please.
LSJI07 - MBITLast Friday at 4:44 PM
the poll votes seem not very security conscious. More of day miners chasing profits. I love them bless! Imho the future is bright for raven, however these issues if not sorted out now will bite hard long term when asset are on the chain and gpu miners are long gone.....
ZaabLast Friday at 4:45 PM
How has the testing of restricted assets been on the test net?
liqdmetalLast Friday at 4:45 PM
Agreed. I dont think x16r is obsolete like that yet however
[Dev-Happy] BlondfrogsLast Friday at 4:45 PM
@Zaab not enough testing at the moment.
HedgerLast Friday at 4:45 PM
Yes, how is the Testing going?
justinjjaLast Friday at 4:45 PM
Like randomX or how are cpus going to be back in the game?
TronLast Friday at 4:45 PM
@Zaab Just getting started at testing at the surface level (RPC calls), and fixing as we go.
ZaabLast Friday at 4:45 PM
And or any updates on the review of dividend code created by the community
Lokar -=Kai=-Last Friday at 4:45 PM
if the amount of hash the unknown pool has is fixed as standarderror indicated then waiting for the community of FPGAers to get onto raven might be advantageous if the fork doesn't hurt FPGAs.
ZaabLast Friday at 4:45 PM
Can't rememeber who was on it
SpyderDevLast Friday at 4:45 PM
@Zaab But we are working on it...
Lokar -=Kai=-Last Friday at 4:46 PM
more hash for votes
JerozLast Friday at 4:46 PM
@Maldon is, @Zaab
TronLast Friday at 4:46 PM
@Zaab There are unit tests and functional tests already, but we'd like more.
[Dev-Happy] BlondfrogsLast Friday at 4:46 PM
@Zaab Dividend code is currently adding test cases for better security. Should have more update on that next meeting
KAwARLast Friday at 4:46 PM
Absolute democracy seems to resemble anarchy or at least civil war. In EVE online they have a type of community voice that get voted in by the community.
ZaabLast Friday at 4:46 PM
No worries was just curious if it was going as planned or significant issues were being found
Obviously some hiccups are expected
More testing is always better!
TronLast Friday at 4:47 PM
Who in here is up for a good civil war? :wink:
ZaabLast Friday at 4:47 PM
Tron v Bruce. Celebrity fight night with proceeds to go to the RVN dev fund
SpyderDevLast Friday at 4:48 PM
Cagefight or mudpit?
JerozLast Friday at 4:48 PM
talking about dev funds..... :wink:
Pho3nix Monk3yLast Friday at 4:49 PM
and there goes the conversation....
KAwARLast Friday at 4:49 PM
I am trying to be serious...
ZaabLast Friday at 4:49 PM
Sorry back to the ascii topic!
traysiLast Friday at 4:49 PM
@Tron What do we need in order to make progress toward a decision on the algo? Is there a plan or a roadmap of sorts to get us some certainty about what we're going to do?
LSJI07 - MBITLast Friday at 4:50 PM
Could we have 3 no BIP9 votes? No1 Friendly to asics, retain status quo. No2 change to x17r minimal changes etc, with no additional future PoW/algo upgrades. No3. Full Asic resistance x22r and see what happens...
:thonk~1:
Sounds messy....
TronLast Friday at 4:51 PM
Right now we're in research mode. We're building CNv4 so we can run some metrics. If that goes well, we can put together x22rc and see how it performs. It will likely gore everyone's ox. CPUs can play, GPUs work, but aren't dominant. ASICs VERY difficult, and FPGAs will have a tough time.
ZaabLast Friday at 4:51 PM
Yeah i feel like the results would be unreliable
TronLast Friday at 4:51 PM
Is this good, or do we lose everyone's vote?
PlayHardLast Friday at 4:52 PM
Fpga will be dead
Lokar -=Kai=-Last Friday at 4:52 PM
why isn;t a simple XOR or something on the table?
ZaabLast Friday at 4:52 PM
The multiple bip9 that is
Lokar -=Kai=-Last Friday at 4:52 PM
something asic breaking but doesn't greatly complicate ongoing efforts for FPGA being my point.
justinjjaLast Friday at 4:52 PM
How are you going to vote for x22rc?
Because if by hashrate that wouldn't pass.
traysiLast Friday at 4:52 PM
Personally I like the idea of x22rc but I'd want to investigate the botnet threat if CPUs are allowed back in.
TronLast Friday at 4:52 PM
XOR is on the table, and was listed in my Medium post. But, the social risk of chain split remains, for very little gain.
traysiLast Friday at 4:53 PM
@Lokar -=Kai=- A small change means that whoever has 45% can probably quickly adapt.
LSJI07 - MBITLast Friday at 4:53 PM
Research sounds good. x22rc could be reduce to x22r for simplicity...
TronLast Friday at 4:53 PM
x22r is a viable option. No CNv4.
LSJI07 - MBITLast Friday at 4:53 PM
Don't know how much time we have to play with though...
Lokar -=Kai=-Last Friday at 4:53 PM
if they have FPGAs yes if they have ASIC then not so much, but I guess that gets to the point, what exactly are we trying to remove from the network?
PlayHardLast Friday at 4:54 PM
Guys my name is Arsen and we designed x16r fpga on bcus. Just about to release it to the public. I am buzzdaves partner.
Cryptonight
Will kill us
But agreed
Asic is possible on x16r
And you dont need 256 core
Cores
traysiLast Friday at 4:55 PM
Hi Arsen. Are you saying CN will kill "us" meaning RVN, or meaning FPGA?
JerozLast Friday at 4:55 PM
This is what im afraid of ^ an algo change killing FPGA as I have the feeling there is a big fpga community working on this
PlayHardLast Friday at 4:55 PM
Fpgas ))
whitefire990Last Friday at 4:55 PM
I am also about to release X16R for CVP13 + BCU1525 FPGA's. I'm open to algo changes but I really don't believe in CPU mining because of botnets. Any CNv4 shifts 100% to CPU mining, even if it is only 1 of the 22 functions.
Lokar -=Kai=-Last Friday at 4:55 PM
namely FPGAs that aren;t memory equipped
like fast mem
not ddr
PlayHardLast Friday at 4:55 PM
Hbm non hbm
Cryptonight
whitefire990Last Friday at 4:56 PM
Right now with both Buzzdave/Altered Silicon and myself (Zetheron) about to release X16R for FPGA's, then the 45% miner's share will decrease to 39% or less.
PlayHardLast Friday at 4:56 PM
Will be dead for fpga
LSJI07 - MBITLast Friday at 4:56 PM
sound so x22r is fpga "friendly" ... more so than asic anyway...
PlayHardLast Friday at 4:56 PM
But a change must be planned
X16r is no way possible to avoid asics
TJayLast Friday at 4:56 PM
@LSJI07 - MBIT I would say less friendly...
whitefire990Last Friday at 4:57 PM
As I mentioned in thenest discussion, asic resistance increases with the square of the number of functions, so X21R is more asic resistant than X16R, but both are pretty resistant
PlayHardLast Friday at 4:58 PM
Yeah more algos make it heavier on ASIC
DirkDiggler (Citadel Architect)Last Friday at 4:58 PM
My interpretation of the whitepaper was that we used x16r as it was brand new (thus ASIC resistant), and that was to ensure a fair launch... We've launched... I don't like the idea of constantly forking to avoid the inevitable ASICs.
x16r was a great "experiment" before we had any exchange listings... that ship has sailed though... not sure about all these x22rs lmnop changes
KAwARLast Friday at 5:00 PM
I believe that it is easier to change the direction of a bicycle than an oil tanker. We feel more like a train. We should lay out new tracks and test on them and find benefits that are acceptable to everyone except train robbers. Then open the new train station with no contentious feelings except a silently disgruntled minority group. ???
Hans_SchmidtLast Friday at 5:01 PM
The most productive action the community can do now re ASICs is to voice support for the devs to make a non-BIP9 change at a chosen block height if/when the need is clear. That removes the pressure to act rashly to avoid voting problems.
LSJI07 - MBITLast Friday at 5:01 PM
Thats why im proposing to fork at least once to a more asic resistant algo (but FPGA "friendly/possible"), with the proviso ideally that no more PoW algo forks are require to provide future ASICs some opportunity to innovate with silicon and efficiency.
TJayLast Friday at 5:01 PM
folks should take into account, that high end FPGAs like BCU1525 on x16r can't beat even previous gen GPUs (Pascal) in terms of hash cost. so they aren't a threat to miners community
PlayHardLast Friday at 5:02 PM
A proper change
Requires proper research
eyz (Silence)Last Friday at 5:02 PM
Just so I'm clear here, we are trying to boot ASICS, don't want CPUs because of Botnets, and are GPU and FPGA friendly right?
PlayHardLast Friday at 5:02 PM
It is not a quick one day process
eyz (Silence)Last Friday at 5:02 PM
If there is a bip9 vote there needs to be a clear explanation as I feel most in the community don't understand exactly what we are trying to fix
TronLast Friday at 5:03 PM
@Hans_Schmidt I like that route. It has some game theoretics. It gives time for miners to adapt. It is only used if needed. It reduces the likelihood of ASICs dominating the network, or even being built.
[Dev-Happy] BlondfrogsLast Friday at 5:03 PM
Hey guys. great convo. We are of course looking to do the best thing for the community and miner. We are going to be signing off here though.
justinjjaLast Friday at 5:03 PM
TJay that comes down to power cost.
If your paying 4c/kw gpus all the way.
But if your a home miner in europe an fpga is your only chance
LSJI07 - MBITLast Friday at 5:03 PM
@Hans_Schmidt How do we decide the block limit and when sufficient evidence is available? I would say we have had much compelling information to date...
[Dev-Happy] BlondfrogsLast Friday at 5:03 PM
Thanks for participating. and keep up the good work :smiley:
Have a good weekend.
CAWWWW
TronLast Friday at 5:03 PM
I haven't seen any compelling evidence of ASICs - yet.
Pho3nix Monk3yLast Friday at 5:03 PM
:v:
JerozLast Friday at 5:04 PM
I suggest to continue discussion in #development and #thenest :smiley:
thanks all!
TronLast Friday at 5:04 PM
Cheers everyone!
KAwARLast Friday at 5:04 PM
Agree with Hans.
DirkDiggler (Citadel Architect)Last Friday at 5:04 PM
thanks Tron
Pho3nix Monk3yLast Friday at 5:04 PM
Ending here. continue in Nest if wanted
DirkDiggler (Citadel Architect)Last Friday at 5:04 PM
I am waiting for compelling evidence myself.
submitted by mrderrik to Ravencoin [link] [comments]

My Consulting Rate Schedule || Why you can't have nice things and be ungrateful

My new home, if you want free advice, subscribe.

https://www.reddit.com/EthMiningClub/

My background:
My Rates - I'll scale by age, makes sense to me
Note: If I don't like you, for whatever reason at this point, there is a 10 Eth / Hour Asshole surcharge
These prices are completely arbitrary that I just pulled out of my ass, pay them , don't pay them, I don't care. If anyone PMs me in regards to help going forward, they will just get a link to this post.
What you get: * 1 hr phone and / or video conference call. Ask me how my day was, ask me technical question - your choice * 15m free phone / video call follow up
You can pay me for my time & experience or you can spend 300 dicking around with your own rigs yourself (Like I did) - I really don't care either way. I just wanted to post this here so I don't need to retype this 10 times a day when people ask me for help from this sub.
Cheers.
-Epic
Edit: Just if you can't Math ( as lots of people here can't ) EVERY 1/mhs you LOSE because your rig is not optimized Equates to .5 Eth / Month LOSS. Do the math on what you are losing. Here - 20/mhs loss = 10 Eth / Month * $8.25 ( Current Rate ) = $82.5. If Eth goes to $20 that is $200 per month on coins you lost ONLY because you did not apply the right settings for your cards. This should make my "fee" look cheap in comparison if you're running multiple cards. And if Eth goes to $1,000 in a few years like Bitcoin did, you will have some serious regrets.

Note: "My rates peak as high as 128MH/s.. so my average will probably be in the 115MH/s range. When I try the local/global-work code and/or setting the allocation percentage higher than 95%, I get errors. Can't remember what specifically.. something about failing to grab DAG info in one big chunk and 'bailing'."

"Hey thank you for the help on etherminer. I finally got the 6-GPU rig up and running. Windows turned out to be more of a headache than Ubuntu so I went back to Linux and figured it out. As per your suggestion I am on ethermine.org using qtminer. (I'm actually offline at the moment, but everything is operational) I used the default qtminer code that tells all of the GPUs to work but it's not entirely clear what is happening. Each GPU appears to be working on the same 'problem'. Is that accurate? As opposed to having each GPU work more independently on a separate problem..? I set the GPU workload to 93%.. Fans to 90%.. everything running cool at ~50c The results of most of the mining calculations appear to get grouped and uploaded to the pool as some sort of 'piece of the puzzle'. Every so often there is a 'solution' with a 'nonce'. How does that relate to getting an ETH reward? Also, how does the affect getting paid so long as the same address is used? I referenced a tutorial and accidentally used .rig1 to initialize qtminer - instead of the name of my computer (I still used my wallet address). I don't understand how all of this impacts getting paid or what my options are for tweaking the configuration. I'll sort it out either way but any additional insight is appreciated. ..single Ether sent as a token of gratitude... https://etherscan.io/tx/0x9782d0cfb5f98cf086e879cc510fd45968aef3a9798ee4281b475bc569eb5c11 (Tx ID was posted) Cheers"

These are the type of PMs I get on a daily basis and 100% can help you with within an hours time.

submitted by EpicEther to EtherMining [link] [comments]

My Consulting Rate Schedule / Experience - If you want serious work done or advice that would take me hours to explain

My background:
My Rates - I'll scale by age, makes sense to me
Note: If I don't like you, for whatever reason at this point, there is a 10 Eth / Hour Asshole surcharge These prices are completely arbitrary, pay them , don't pay them, I don't care. Going forward, if anyone PMs me in regards to help , they will just get a link to this post. Pretty much wrote all of this up to save myself time from 100 PMs a day from ungrateful people at /EtherMining
What you get: * 1 hr phone and / or video conference call. * Ask me how my day was, ask me technical question - your choice * 15m free phone / video call follow up * I am a reasonable guy, if I projected an issue to be done in x hours and it's not fixed by that time, I'll stay on the line until it is
You can pay me for my time & experience or you can spend 500 messing around with your own rigs yourself (Like I did) - It is completely your choice. This is more of an option for people who have extra crash and don't have time time to put in like I did.

Cheers,

-Epic™

Edit: Just if you can't Math ( as lots of people can't - no big deal ) EVERY 1/mhs you LOSE because your rig is not optimized Equates to .5 Eth / Month LOSS. Do the math on what you are losing. Here - 20/mhs loss = 10 Eth / Month * $8.25 ( Current Rate ) = $82.5. If Eth goes to $20 that is $200 per month on coins you lost ONLY because you did not apply the right settings for your cards. This should make my "fee" look cheap in comparison if you're running multiple cards. And if Eth goes to $1,000 in a few years like Bitcoin did, you will have some serious regrets.
PM: Pro Bono Consulting Client:
"My rates peak as high as 128MH/s.. so my average will probably be in the 115MH/s range. When I try the local/global-work code and/or setting the allocation percentage higher than 95%, I get errors. Can't remember what specifically.. something about failing to grab DAG info in one big chunk and 'bailing'."
PM: Pro Bono Consulting Client:
"Hey thank you for the help on etherminer. I finally got the 6-GPU rig up and running. Windows turned out to be more of a headache than Ubuntu so I went back to Linux and figured it out. As per your suggestion I am on ethermine.org using qtminer. (I'm actually offline at the moment, but everything is operational) I used the default qtminer code that tells all of the GPUs to work but it's not entirely clear what is happening. Each GPU appears to be working on the same 'problem'. Is that accurate? As opposed to having each GPU work more independently on a separate problem..? I set the GPU workload to 93%.. Fans to 90%.. everything running cool at ~50c The results of most of the mining calculations appear to get grouped and uploaded to the pool as some sort of 'piece of the puzzle'. Every so often there is a 'solution' with a 'nonce'. How does that relate to getting an ETH reward? Also, how does the affect getting paid so long as the same address is used? I referenced a tutorial and accidentally used .rig1 to initialize qtminer - instead of the name of my computer (I still used my wallet address). I don't understand how all of this impacts getting paid or what my options are for tweaking the configuration. I'll sort it out either way but any additional insight is appreciated. ..single Ether sent as a token of gratitude... https://etherscan.io/tx/0x9782d0cfb5f98cf086e879cc510fd45968aef3a9798ee4281b475bc569eb5c11 (Tx ID was posted) Cheers"
PM: Corporate Client: This is a real PM I received and the type of PM I will respond to if you want to work with me -
"Dear EpicEther, My name is [Real First AND Last name] and i live and study in the [Country] ( Public administration and Philosophy at [School Name] University. Me and four partners are setting up a mining company after building a succesfull mining rig containing 5 r9 280x cards. At the moment we have potential investors and a brochure containing information about ethereum and different mining set-up's with estimated costs for the inestors. I would really like to have a conversation with a veteran in the mining world and woud like to discus the following questions. - Is investing in more expensive GPU's worth it since mining will be faced out in the coming year. - How can we help to grow the ethereum network Kind regards, [Real Full Name]"

These are the type of PMs I get on a daily basis and 100% can help you with within an hours time.

submitted by EpicEther to EthMiningClub [link] [comments]

Epic™'s Consulting Rate Schedule / Experience

My background:
My Rates - I'll scale by age, makes sense to me
Note: If I don't like you, for whatever reason at this point, there is a 10 Eth / Hour Asshole surcharge These prices are completely arbitrary, pay them , don't pay them, I don't care. Going forward, if anyone PMs me in regards to help , they will just get a link to this post. Pretty much wrote all of this up to save myself time from 100 PMs a day from ungrateful people at /EtherMining
What you get: * 1 hr phone and / or video conference call. * Ask me how my day was, ask me technical question - your choice * 15m free phone / video call follow up * I am a reasonable guy, if I projected an issue to be done in x hours and it's not fixed by that time, I'll stay on the line until it is
You can pay me for my time & experience or you can spend 500 messing around with your own rigs yourself (Like I did) - It is completely your choice. This is more of an option for people who have extra crash and don't have time time to put in like I did.

Cheers,

-Epic™

Edit: Just if you can't Math ( as lots of people can't - no big deal ) EVERY 1/mhs you LOSE because your rig is not optimized Equates to .5 Eth / Month LOSS. Do the math on what you are losing. Here - 20/mhs loss = 10 Eth / Month * $8.25 ( Current Rate ) = $82.5. If Eth goes to $20 that is $200 per month on coins you lost ONLY because you did not apply the right settings for your cards. This should make my "fee" look cheap in comparison if you're running multiple cards. And if Eth goes to $1,000 in a few years like Bitcoin did, you will have some serious regrets.
PM: Pro Bono Consulting Client:
"My rates peak as high as 128MH/s.. so my average will probably be in the 115MH/s range. When I try the local/global-work code and/or setting the allocation percentage higher than 95%, I get errors. Can't remember what specifically.. something about failing to grab DAG info in one big chunk and 'bailing'."
PM: Pro Bono Consulting Client:
"Hey thank you for the help on etherminer. I finally got the 6-GPU rig up and running. Windows turned out to be more of a headache than Ubuntu so I went back to Linux and figured it out. As per your suggestion I am on ethermine.org using qtminer. (I'm actually offline at the moment, but everything is operational) I used the default qtminer code that tells all of the GPUs to work but it's not entirely clear what is happening. Each GPU appears to be working on the same 'problem'. Is that accurate? As opposed to having each GPU work more independently on a separate problem..? I set the GPU workload to 93%.. Fans to 90%.. everything running cool at ~50c The results of most of the mining calculations appear to get grouped and uploaded to the pool as some sort of 'piece of the puzzle'. Every so often there is a 'solution' with a 'nonce'. How does that relate to getting an ETH reward? Also, how does the affect getting paid so long as the same address is used? I referenced a tutorial and accidentally used .rig1 to initialize qtminer - instead of the name of my computer (I still used my wallet address). I don't understand how all of this impacts getting paid or what my options are for tweaking the configuration. I'll sort it out either way but any additional insight is appreciated. ..single Ether sent as a token of gratitude... https://etherscan.io/tx/0x9782d0cfb5f98cf086e879cc510fd45968aef3a9798ee4281b475bc569eb5c11 (Tx ID was posted) Cheers"
PM: Corporate Client: This is a real PM I received and the type of PM I will respond to if you want to work with me -
"Dear EpicEther, My name is [Real First AND Last name] and i live and study in the [Country] ( Public administration and Philosophy at [School Name] University. Me and four partners are setting up a mining company after building a succesfull mining rig containing 5 r9 280x cards. At the moment we have potential investors and a brochure containing information about ethereum and different mining set-up's with estimated costs for the inestors. I would really like to have a conversation with a veteran in the mining world and woud like to discus the following questions. - Is investing in more expensive GPU's worth it since mining will be faced out in the coming year. - How can we help to grow the ethereum network Kind regards, [Real Full Name]"

These are the type of PMs I get on a daily basis and 100% can help you with within an hours time.

submitted by EpicEther to EpicConsultingClub [link] [comments]

BITCOIN HALVING AFTERMATH!! IS BITCOIN MINING PROFITABLE 2020?! BTC & CRYPTO NEWS! EB49 – Meni Rosenfeld: Mining Pool Reward Systems, Bitcoin Economics, Bitcoin in Israel How to mine bitcoins? What is Cryptomining? solo mining -pool Mining EXPLAINED! #AXT Mining pools - bitcoin mining pools: how to generate ... Bitcoin Mining with Asic

7 Best Bitcoin Mining Pool in 2020 Reviewed (+ Fees Compared) ... Types of mining From the technical side, mining can be divided into 3 types, depending on the equipment: GPU mining, i.e. mining on video cards. CPU mining, i.e. mining on the processor. Mining on ASICs (ASICs) — special equipment created for the extraction of cryptocurrencies that work on certain algorithms. Depending on the ... Pool Mining: represents lending your mining with bigger groups and then sharing the profit. For those who are still eager to get their hands on Bitcoins, you’ll have a better chance with Pool Mining than with any other type of mining. Cloud Mining: probably the quickest way to eliminate the cost and expenses of home-based crypto mining. Cloud ... Bitcoin solves the problems and headaches that are usually the hallmark of other types of monetary transactions. The Bitcoin network is quick, secure and doesn’t require most of the additional fees you’re stuck with when you use normal banking. Also, since Bitcoin is not centralized and works on the basis of a public “ledger” all members of the network have access, there can be no ... Aligning yourself with a Bitcoin mining pool which emphasizes all three will help guard against future hassle and headaches, and allow you to better recognize payout loads and times. AntPool Owned and operated by Bitmain Technologies (the world’s largest designer of ASIC chips for Bitcoin mining), Antpool typically comes in at the top of the list for miners looking for an efficient and ... Like everything in life, there is a risk, these risks include the possibility of fraud and lower profit due to the opaque mining operations. There is various type of cloud mining,.

[index] [49494] [51026] [39492] [18474] [21741] [44755] [26050] [2375] [21282] [50387]

BITCOIN HALVING AFTERMATH!! IS BITCOIN MINING PROFITABLE 2020?! BTC & CRYPTO NEWS!

Meni has been studying mining pool reward methods for several years and in 2011, wrote a paper titled “Analysis of Bitcoin Pooled Mining Reward Systems”. This research gave him a broad ... BITCOIN HALVING IS OVER! What is the aftermath of BTC Halving? Is Bitcoin Mining profitable? will bitcoin miners sell? bitcoin mining is an interesting topic after the bitcoin block reward halving ... mining pools - bitcoin & cryptocurrency mining pools explained best mining pools pps vs pplns. - mining pool hub. Bitcoin Mining Pools Explained and Review... Mining Pool Shares, Difficulty and Luck Explained - Duration: 10 ... Bitcoin & Cryptocurrency Mining Pools Explained Best Mining Pools PPS vs PPLNS - Duration: 18:17. VoskCoin 9,965 views. 18:17 ... Simple, quick overview of which mining pool to join. When considering which mining pool to use make sure to take in account the block reward for the mining pool your looking at. I dont want to say ...

#